Untitled Document
www.expresspharmaonline.com FORTNIGHTLY INSIGHT FOR PHARMA PROFESSIONALS
1-15 March 2006  
Untitled Document
Sections

Market
Management
Research
Pharma Life

Services
Subscribe/Renew
Archives
Contact Us
Events
Pharma Excellence Awards
Network Sites
Express Computer
Network Magazine India
Express Hospitality
Express TravelWorld
feBusiness Traveller
Exp. Healthcare Mgmt.
Express Textile
Group Sites
ExpressIndia
Indian Express
Financial Express

Partner Assns.
Home - Market - Article

Venturing into the unknown

The Indian pharma industry requires entrepreneurs to blossom. Yet, there are few takers for their proposals. Nandini Patwardhan ascertains why PE funding out does venture capital in India

Companies require funds at various stages—the start up, expansion, and maturity stage. While finances are easily available for already existing businesses, entrepreneurs find it difficult to secure funds through traditional sources for their dream projects. More so, if their projects are in the pharma and biotech industries as these are knowledge intensive sectors characterised by high risks, long lock-in periods, but high and long-term rewards.

Less VC, more PE

The recent years have witnessed a decrease in Venture Capital (VC) funding in the pharma and biotech space and an increase in Private Equity (PE). PE is the capital acquired by a company to fund its expansion activities when a company reaches the growth stage. Timmy Kandhari, Executive Director, PriceWaterhouseCoopers, opines that 2005 has been a good year for the country with foreign institutional investments crossing the $10 billion mark and amounts raised through IPOs aggregating to $6 billion.

According to data from Venture Intelligence India, a division of TSJ Media, Private Equity and Venture Capital firms invested US$2.3 billion in Indian companies across 147 deals during 2005. Of these, the Life Sciences sector (including Pharma and Biotech companies) witnessed investments worth $217 million across 13 deals. However, start-ups did not find favour among PE & VC investors with SIDBI VC's $1.7 million investment in Bravo Healthcare, a Bombay-based pharmaceuticals company, being the lone deal in this category within the Life Sciences sector.

Sanjiv Kaul, Managing Director, ChrysCapital, explains, “The years 2004 and 2005 have been good for PE investments in pharma vis-à-vis VC. This is because companies that are valued close to Rs 100 crore, want to take their business to the next level of Rs 200-300 crore. For this they need a capex of Rs 100-200 crore, which is raised through a combination of debt-equity balancing and through PE investment.” Also, Indian companies excel in chemistry and re-engineering. “With some $50-odd billion worth of drugs going off patent, there was an opportunity for Indian companies to expand through the PE route, and that is what they did,” explains Sehgal.

Benefits galore
Entrepreneurs benefit from VC funding in the following manner:
  • Finance: The VC injects long-term equity finance, which provides a solid capital base for future growth. The VC may be capable of providing additional rounds of funding, required for future growth.
  • Business Partner: The VC is a business partner, sharing the risks and rewards.
  • Mentoring: The VC is able to provide strategic, operational, and financial advice to the company based on past experience with other companies in similar situations.
  • Alliances: The VC also has a network of contacts in many areas that can add value to the company, such as in recruiting key personnel, providing contacts in international markets, introductions to strategic partners and, if needed, co-investments with other venture capital firms.
  • Exit: The VC is experienced in the process of preparing a company for an initial public offering (IPO) and facilitating in trade sales.

(Courtesy: IVCA)

Venture capital matters

Venture capital refers to funds, provided by heavy risk takers who believe in the high risk, high reward philosophy. Essentially, it is an investment in the management of young, rapidly growing companies that have the potential to innovation and possess entrepreneurial spirit.

VC is a term reserved for seed capital during the incubation and start-up phases, while PE funds are utilised for growth and expansion, and also at pre-IPO stages, where the idea is established and growth is planned.

VC is critical to a boom in any industry, because it supports the upcoming companies. Small ventures that hold the potential to challenge the biggies, but do not have the financial muscle, use VC to concretise their business. Venture capitalists also bring with them the business expertise, experience and the networking that small players do not have access to. VCs can assist the pharma and biotech space by making funds available for various innovative research and technology intensive projects that will otherwise die a premature death, or worse be executed by competitors before we get around to it.

Nobody can ignore the importance of VC funding. So, why is the pharma and biotech industry characterised by less of VC and more of PE investments?

Headline grabbing deals
1. Dr. Reddy's Laboratories raised $101 million in two deals to bankroll its generic drugs business and new drug development. Citigroup Venture and ICICI Venture contributed $22.5 million each and Dr. Reddy's contributed $7.5 million towards Perlecan Pharma's initial equity capital.

2. The Medreich Group, a Bangalore-based contract manufacturer, raised $24 million from Temasek Holdings to expand its Indian manufacturing operations and make a foray overseas.

3. International Financial Corporation (IFC), private finance arm of the World Bank made a $ 15 million equity investment in Dabur Pharma to expand manufacturing facility and commercialise R&D.

4. IFC also provided $ 5 million in equity to Bharat Biotech.

5. The $7.5-million second round raised by Bangalore-based biotechnology firm Avestha Gengraine Technologies was an early-stage investment by Development Finance Company & IFC.


Disadvantage VC

There are multiple reasons for the lacklustre VC investment in the pharma and biotech space in India. Sanjay Sehgal, Managing Partner at Singapore-based East West Capital Partners, a private equity firm focused on investing in the healthcare industry has a different perspective on the issue. He says, “It is a case of taking the low hanging fruit, in short, doing the easiest thing.” In case of companies that already exist, the risk associated at the start-up stage is already taken away. So the probability of returns is much more on each investment.

The present scenario exemplifies the Catch-22 situation. “VCs may want to fund innovative projects by entrepreneurs who might have some prior experience and credibility,” opines Sowmynarayan, Senior Manager, Business Development and Alliances at the Bangalore based, Strand LifeSciences. But no enterpreneur will acquire experience until his first project takes off.

Here are some of the other factors that have resulted in decreased VC activity in this sector:

VCs limitations: Industry experts are of the opinion that spotting good early stage opportunities in India is a challenge as there are not enough experienced or business savvy technoprenuers. Hence the VC has to proactively identify entrepreneurs, help shape business ideas, and provide significant handholding.

Risk averse: The Indian VC industry has become over cautious, a probable outcome of the dotcom bust. With a view to minimise risk, the Indian VC industry has adopted a safer late-stage or private equity investment model.

Lack of IP: VCs blame Indian pharma for lack of IP. Sandeep Singhal, Managing Director, WestBridge Capital Partners, states “The pharma industry is knowledge-based industry, the sector is evolving everyday. Once Indian pharma goes into the next stage of IP generation, there will be significant interest in the sector.”

Lack of business perspective: If entrepreneurs themselves will not take risks with projects in this sector, how can the VCs? In some cases, entrepreneurs cannot come up with a convincing plan. “Not many business plans stand the test of scrutiny,” says Kaul.

Lack of institutional research: VCs in America and Europe have often funded research activities undertaken jointly between research institutes and pharma and biotech majors. However, in India, the VCs state that they have not been approached by any institutes so far.

Tips to attract VC
Understand market needs: You need to understand the market needs before approaching a VC. “Solutions have to be developed for existing problems. One cannot develop a solution and then look for a problem. There has to be a balance between technology push and the market pull,” asserts Sowmynarayan.

Business plan: VC investment is long-term in nature and ranges from three to 10 years. To attract investment, a comprehensive business that provides information on the planned product, the market potential, the necessary talent pool and the required seed capital, is crucial.

Zeroing-in on few VCs: Do your homework on the VC firms you plan to approach; it is not a good idea to randomly circulate your business plan. You need to study the particular investment preferences set down by the VC firm. Often VCs have preferences for particular stages of investment, amount of investment, industry sectors and geographical location.

Networking: Networking is key. “We talk at several conferences and seminars in the US about our company, our successes and our future plans. That is the way we network. I don't think Strand Life Sciences was actually sending business plans to ten different VC firms. When you get into these networking discussions with people, they realise the potential for investing in a company,” explains Sowmynarayan.

The VCs perspective: Look at the issue from the VCs perspective. “Normally VCs look at the management team, the ownership structure, the promoters credentials, quality of the business plan, the idea itself, the exit options, and whether they can add value to the project by not just providing money, but also by leveraging their networks and experience,” explains Sehgal.

The way ahead

To reach a stage of success, entrepreneurs in this space need to be willing to make substantial, long-term investments in much riskier projects than they have done in the past. India needs a financial community with an appetite for risk and willingness to fund innovation. “There is strong potential for the biotech industry in India due to extensive biodiversity of plant and marine life, large2 population, for rapid and low cost clinical trials and low-cost skilled labour with skills in chemistry and manufacturing”, asserts Kandhari. IFC has already invested around $110 million across 14 projects in the life sciences sector globally, of which a significant portion ($43 million) is in four projects in India.

“The pharma industry is now attracting attention because it is more easily understood today. The Indian pharma sector is expected to be a billion dollar industry over the next 10 years and WestBridge Capital Partners aims to be part of this growth,” remarks Singhal.

Kandhari signs off by saying, “Venture Capitalists, who are willing to take risks and promote innovation and growth in mid- and small-sized companies and support their R&D investments and expansion of their markets and manufacturing bases to other developing and regulated countries would participate in the biotech revolution which is about to unfold in India”.

editorial@expresspharmaonline.com

 


Untitled Document
Untitled Document
© Copyright 2001: Indian Express Newspapers (Mumbai) Limited (Mumbai, India). All rights reserved throughout the world. This entire site is compiled in Mumbai by the Business Publications Division (BPD) of the Indian Express Newspapers (Mumbai) Limited. Site managed by BPD.