|
Rethinking R&D
As more Indian pharma companies hive off their R&D units,
Viveka Roychowdhury analyses the methods behind the moves 2008 may well
be a watershed year for the Indian pharmaceutical industry. Five to six major
Indian pharma companies, with a few more sitting on the fence, have announced
plans to hive off their New Chemical Entity (NCE) research units into stand-alone
companies.
This
marks a major mindset move, marking the coming-of-age of an industry previously
tagged as a 'copycat'. The early birds, Dr Reddy's Laboratories (DRL) and Sun
Pharmaceuticals were trendsetters and after Sun Pharma's NCE research unit successful
listing on the stock exchange, the trickle looks set to become a wave. The timing
seems right - some industry analysts say that the Indian drug research pipeline
has a total of 60 molecules at various stages of development in labs across
the country.
Smart move
It is a no-brainer that this is one smart market move. Across
sectors, hive-offs seem to have been the flavour of the year. As Hitesh Gajaria,
Sector Head, Pharma, KPMG India puts it, "Unlocking of Value through Hive-Off
has been the dominant theme in Capital markets during 2007 not only in the Pharma
but also in many other sectors such as Telecom, Power etc." There are two
key objectives of this move. One, to provide necessary financial resources to
advance R&D initiatives and bring in sophisticated investors who understand
the dynamics of this business and have a long term investment horizon. And second
to increase the shareholder value by improving the overall profitability (ROCE
/ RONW) by hiving off the resources consuming R&D segment.

Hitesh Gajaria, Sector Head, Pharma,
KPMG India
|
Looking back at his company's pioneering move, Dilip Shanghvi,
Chairman and MD, Sun Pharmaceuticals says, "The idea was to bring in focus
on the innovative projects that SPARC has in its pipeline. Innovative research
produces results over the long term and hence it is a bit premature to talk
of realization of objectives. But with this separation, we are beginning to
see sharpening of focus."
A DRL spokesperson clarifies that the company has not done
a demerger of its R&D arm as in the case of other Indian pharma companies.
It is primarily a derisking strategy where DRL along with two private equity
partners came together to form Perlecan Pharma. The formation of Perlecan Pharma
was an innovative financial agreement which brought to table the strengths of
the three companies. Perlecan Pharma provided DRL's Drug Discovery program,
a model to rapidly advance its existing as well as future NCE assets through
Phase II trials and seek out-licensing, co-development or joint commercialization
opportunities thereby enhancing the value of the pipeline. Also this model was
to enable DRL's Discovery Research division to work on multiple development
programs.

Himanshu Varia, Institutional Sales,
Asit C Mehta Investment Intermediates
|
In fact, expenditure on R&D has traditionally been seen
as a 'cost' by Indian pharma companies, when it was actually an 'investment'
in the future. The industry remained focused on generics and the domestic business
segments, and reinvested a certain percentage of profits into R&D. Of late,
margins in the generics business started dwindling, due to severe pricing pressures
in major markets like the US. On the home front, price control also hit the
companies' balance sheets. Thus sustainable R&D expenditure fluctuated as
per the performance of pharma companies. Himanshu Varia, Institutional Sales,
Asit C Mehta Investment Intermediates, points out that the research outfit would
be able to raise capital either by long term debt funding or equity contribution
from investors who are well informed about the risk-rewards involved in research
projects.
Pharma companies going this way anticipate a savings from Day One. Nicholas
Piramal India Limited (NPIL) expects to complete the approval process by February
and to list the de-merged entity by May-June. While declaring the third quarter
results, Ajay Piramal, Chairman, NPIL predicted that once the de-merger process
was completed, the consolidated operating margin will go up by almost three
percent. This is because Rs 73 crores will move off the NPIL balance sheet and
be reflected in the new de-merged entity.
Analysying the trend from a global perspective, Gajaria lists
three similar moves. In 2002, Aventis spun off its osteoporosis research arm,
Proskelia, with a majority investment (60% stake) in it being taken by a key
private equity firm, Warburg Pincus. The second was in June 2004, when SRI International,
an independent R&D organization divested a division that develops cost-effective
medicines, called Bridge Pharmaceuticals Corporation. Novartis' split of its
nanotechnology research arm, Zeptosens AG, which was later acquired by Bayer,
is the third example.
- Number of research molecules in the R&D
pipeline and their development status (Phase, I / II / III, etc.)
- Target therapeutic indications and their
market potential including growth rate and prevalence
- Company's track record in developing molecules
for similar therapeutic category
- Risk profile - whether company is venturing
into R&D on its own or has a strategic alliance for drug discovery
- Potential in-license / out-license Opportunities
- Backing of Sophisticated and Mature Investors
such as PE funds and / or Venture Capital Funds having a Healthcare
Focus.
(Source: Hitesh Gajaria, Sector
Head, Pharma, KPMG India)
|
Valuation of R&D pipeline

Dr Swati Piramal Director-Strategic Alliances & Communications,
Nicholas Piramal India
|
A key to the hive-off process is to first value the assets
to be hived off. Gajaria says that valuation of standalone R&D units is
a complex task and involves lot of assumptions. However, at the top of his list
would be the number of research molecules and their development status.
Varia adds that the method adopted may either be an option
valuation model or the frequently used discounted cash flow valuation which
takes into consideration the series of cash flows that may accrue from the molecule
(milestone and royalty payments from out licensing or sales revenues from commercial
launch). Other things to be considered is the potential market size that these
molecules are intended for, contemporary drugs and competing pipelines of other
companies. According to Gajaria, Real Options Methodology implicitly accounts
for economic abandonment and are therefore better suited to evaluate new drug
development.
Dr Swati Piramal, Director - Strategic Alliances & Communications,
NPIL points out that valuation of the R&D pipeline of Indian companies is
somewhat hampered by the fact that there has not been a hit (successful drug
molecule) so far. She says that previously there were no pharma specialist analysts
based out of India but that is no longer the case today.

Dr Dilip Shanghvi, Chairman and MD,
Sun Pharmaceuticals
|
Stock market response has been very good, according to Dr
Piramal, as existing shareholders will get one share of the new company for
every share of NPIL. With this, they get a present day profit-making company
as well as a chance to cash in on the long term opportunity in the NCE entity.
So they can hedge their bets. NPIL intends to divest not more than 10-20 percent
of the NCE company's equity, to a strategic investor, who could be either a
financial entity or an industry player.
Other companies are joining the bandwagon, albeit with minor modifications in
their strategies. Like NPIL, Ranbaxy Laboratories and Wockhardt have also announced
planes to de-merge their NCE R&D. Glenmark Pharmaceuticals recently did
the reverse: kept R&D and spun off its generic arm. Sensing that the market
may not be comfortable evaluating research, Biocon is planning to list its contract
research arm, Syngene International, as it believes that outsourcing is an easier
business to value.
Tax sops sweeten the deal?
Gajaria sounds a cautionary note, when he says, "Factors such as investor
profile, investment structuring, tax implications and access to funds will be
enablers. Ultimately the stand alone performance of these standalone R&D
companies over a period of time will determine the lasting impact of such moves."
So is the R&D dream a bubble waiting to burst? The latest threat, at least
at perception level, seems to be the Government's stand that the 150 percent
weighted deduction allowed on R&D expenditure would not extend to standalone
R&D units. Explaining the situation, Dr Piramal says, "We have asked
the (Finance) Ministry to extend Section 81B to the pure R&D companies."
Thanks to a sunset clause in this section, the tax sops expired last year, and
there is intense pre-budget lobbying to extend this Section for another ten
years, as well as cover the R&D hive -offs on the anvil. Even if the section
is not extended to standalone R&D units, industry observers say that companies
could claim tax breaks on both units by conducting some manufacturing activity
at the standalone R&D unit as well, meeting the current criteria.
The provision seems open to misuse, but this is refuted by Dr Piramal. According
to her, there are strict criteria to be met and site inspections by the Department
of Science and Technology (DST) before a unit is certified as a DST-recognised
R&D centre to quality for tax breaks.
When asked to respond on this matter, a Sun Pharma spokesperson said, "As
we understand, the weighted deduction is available for manufacturing companies
that do research. We wouldn't be able to comment on other companies' reasons
for hiving off R&D. Companies seeking to de-merge for strategic reasons
(as ours) would have a different set of priorities."
| Company |
Annual spend on R&D |
Molecules in Pipeline |
Target date for launch of first molecule |
| DRL |
7-8 percent of revenue |
5 NCEs |
2011-12 |
| Sun Pharma Advanced Research Company (SPARC):
already listed |
$65- 70 million in the next three years |
4 NCEs, of which 3 leads in pre-clinical 4 NDDS platforms |
--------
|
| NPIL |
5 percent of sales |
8 NCEs, 5 leads in pre-clinical |
2110-11 |
| Biocon |
15 percent of sales |
7 NCEs |
2010 |
| Wockhardt |
8-9 percent of sales |
10 NCEs |
2012-13 |
Results matter
Lost in the euphoria of stock market hype, is the reality of research-at the
end of the day, laboratory results are all that matters and drug research is
a tricky business. All the hype and positive sentiment could be wiped out with
one major miss. There has been speculation that DRL's strategic investors in
Perlecan, are pulling out. There are concerns that DRL's foremost molecule in
clinical trials, in the same class as GSK's Avandia, will suffer the same fate
and be associated with increased heart risks. A DRL spokesperson refused to
comment on market speculation.
Drug research thus remains a gamble and the chips, the elusive and unpredictable
molecules. Established players are investing for the future and preparing for
a long wait, before they see results. Most are hedging their bets, to maintain
positive cash flows. NPIL's deals with Merck and Lilly, Glenmark's with Merck
and Ranbaxy's with GSK are examples of this strategy. When the chips are down,
the stock markets bleed. But for now, industry is in a wait and watch mode as
no one is willing to write off the Indian players.
viveka.r@expressindia.com
|