|
Re-examining CSR
Being in the business of medicine, pharmacos should be seen
as saviours but the reality is different. Some of them do have Corporate Social
Responsibility (CSR) programmes but this is still the exception rather than
the norm. Aashruti Kak explores
The
term Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) comprises of three big words; big
in terms of either meaning or letters. But what does it really imply? "CSR
or corporate citizenship forms the backbone of a company. A company must tirelessly
aspire to be a reasonable and conscientious corporate citizen, based on trust,
transparency and accountability. This also involves societal engagement beyond
products and profitability," says Ranjit Shahani, Vice Chairman and Managing
Director, Novartis India. Keeping the above in mind, pharmacos need to contribute
towards society by involving themselves in activities in the field of healthcare,
education, and other environmental and civic initiatives, and should try and
delineate these activities from business.
So, what exactly is the image of the pharma industry in India in the eyes of
society as far as CSR is concerned? "We believe that the pharma industry
needs to be recognised for its positive contribution to the healthcare of the
nation," says Shahani. Vinay Somani, Trustee, Karmayog, puts forth a different
point of view, "Society in general is relatively unaware of issues and
facts about the pharma industry, and so, has no image or view of the industry,
let alone be a positive one. People are more likely to have an image of an individual
company, rather than of the industry as a whole." He goes on to say,"
The pharma industry do not have a positive image amongst those who are aware
of issues and facts concerning it, partly because of lack of transparency from
the industry itself."
Erroneous zones
"The
dilemma of pharma companies is to balance increased commitment to CSR in
developing countries and elsewhere against the demands of investor and financial
markets to generate sufficient financial returns on extensive investments
in R&D"
- Ranjit Shahani
Vice Chairman and Managing Director
Novartis India
|
One of the few defects in pharma industry's drive to facilitate
easier access to medicines to the underprivileged sections of the society are
that inspite of penetrating potentially huge and emerging markets and making
profits, the citizens of those very countries are still deprived of their fundamental
right to health ie. relevant and affordable medicines. This is mainly because
companies view certain approaches that tackle access to medicines issue as a
mere reputational problem. This has resulted in erratic and unplanned strategies
that have further failed to deliver sustainable solutions. What the industry
must do is inculcate fresh approaches to keep easier access to medicines at
the forefront., In the process, this should involve different business strategies
and policies in order to become more 'responsible'. After all, the ultimate
role of the pharma industry is to provide medicines, and affordable ones at
that.
Although many companies have improved and adopted various policies to encourage
access of medicines in diseases like HIV and AIDS, tuberculosis and malaria,
the scope of reaching out to the masses is still limited as there are millions
of people who are yet to get their fair share of medicines for current, new
and recurring old diseases. It is definite that it will take a while for pharmacos
to infuse initiatives related to patent and pricing issues, R&D, public-private
partnerships (PPPs) and the correct use of medicines into their policies wholly,
but the biggest fear is that it might be too late, given that there is always
a chance for a pandemic to strike anytime.
There have been reports by NGOs, namely, Karmayog (in India) and Oxfam International,
that indicate that pharmacos have failed in their social duties
and have stated that pharma MNCs need to be more socially responsible
with regards to their pricing practices, R&D priorities and IPR management
in developing nations.
The November 2007 report of Oxfam InternationalInvesting for lifestated
that the current approaches of the industry do not address the problem sufficiently.
The report listed out four major shortcomings of the industry
The industry is facing failure to implement systematic and transparent tiered-pricing
mechanisms for medicines of therapeutic value to poor people in developing countries,
where prices are set according to a standard formula, which reflects ability
to pay and the price of generic versions where they exist.
There is lack of R&D to address the dearth of dedicated products for diseases
that predominantly affect poor people in developing countries. This includes
drug formulations that are applicable and usable in the developing world. Between
1999 and 2004, there were only three new drugs for neglected diseases out of
163 new chemical entities (NCEs).
Persistent inflexibility on intellectual property protection (IPR), and in some
cases, active lobbying for stricter patent rules and legal challenges to governments'
use of TRIPS public-health safeguards have prevented poor people from accessing
inexpensive generic versions of essential medicines.
The industry focuses too much on donations, which by their nature are unpredictable
and have been found to cause chaos in the market for low-cost medicines as well
as undermining generic competition.
Hence, the report states that hiking up prices, aggressively defending patents
and prolonging existing ones through 'ever-greening' rather than investing in
R&D of new medicines have undermined needs for lower prices, flexible approaches
to patenting, and R&D investment into diseases relevant to the developing
world.
Karmayog, in its recent CSR rating of 30 pharmacos (as a part of a large scale
rating of 500 companies over various sectors), rated 32 pharmacos on a scale
of one to five on the basis of the nature of their products and services provided,
the needs of society, impact of the usage of various products and services by
the companies along with environmental sensitivity, resource allocation for
CSR, and the reach of CSR activities (for employees, within the vicinity and
for society as a whole). According to the NGO, a company must spend an amount
equivalent to at least 0.2 percent of its sales for CSR activities. Such an
amount provides an idea of the magnitude of CSR that can be done by that company.
As per the ratings (shown in the table), 38 percent of pharmacos had CSR within
the vicinity; 31 percent had no CSR activities; 28 percent had CSR within the
vicinity and for society at large; and only three percent had CSR for employees.
Dr Reddy's Laboratories (DRL) and Lupin were the only drug companies that have
been visibly and effectively working on the CSR front; and Aventis Pharma was
the only company that had CSR programmes for its employees.
Contributing enough?
"Explicitly,
our CSR programmes are independent to divisions and operational areas, and
we are in the process of integrating our policy as part of our new initiatives
to build a single brand"
- Dr Swati Piramal
Director-Strategic Alliances and Communications
Piramal Healthcare
|
"Corporate citizenship is the right thing to do and essential
to maintaining our license to operate, innovate and grow," says Shahani.
"Through responsible business, we can create value for society (all patients,
including those who cannot afford treatment) by resting our commitment on four
pillarspatients, business conduct, people and communities and environmental
care," he adds. Ensuring that CSR is an integral part of the way business
is done through processes and governance is also very important.
Unfortunately, a majority of pharmacos in India do not have
formal written CSR policies or a certified management system for CSR. Also there
is hardly any resource commitment in most companies, as CSR is undertaken in
the absence of systematic approaches. Hence, the deployment and monitoring of
investments made in CSR comes under the shadow of uncertainty.
However, there are some that do follow a procedure when it comes to deploying
and monitoring CSR. Shahani explains the process in Novartis, "In India,
there is a Corporate Citizenship Committee at the corporate level with senior
managers at the helm. The company has constituted a corporate citizenship team
comprising senior executives and headed by the Vice Chairman and Managing Director.
The core team comprises of Head Corporate Affairs, Corporate Communications
and Company Secretary, Head Investor Relations and General Counsel, with representation
from the various businesses. The team meets at intervals to discuss issues related
to corporate citizenship and are responsible for driving it across the organisation.
An annual report is sent to the parent company and an assurance audit is conducted
at intervals."
Coordinators are appointed for Novartis Community Partnership Week and a consolidated
report is submitted to headquarters. The in-house magazine, Novartis News, reports
on the various projects the company has worked with or intends to work with.
Novartis News goes out to all employees across India. Corporate Citizenship
initiatives have also been covered in the Novartis India Annual Report that
goes out to around 52,000 shareholders and key opinion leaders. The company's
internal audit system also includes audits of the CSR program and performance
including the system for analysing relevant data.
The company also has an audit assurance process conducted by PriceWaterhouseCoopers.
Shahani shares the values of the company, "Novartis believes in getting
involved in social activities where it has the ability to make a difference.
This is different from merely 'donating money'. Its programs are therefore in
the areas of healthcare, education and environment. Sponsorship and patronage
are seen as being distinct from CSR activities, in the sense that they are usually
ad-hoc while CSR activities are conducted on a long term sustainable basis.
As a 'caring and curing company', CSR in Novartis has moved from want
to do to need to do.
In India, Novartis gives Glivec free of charge to more than 8,800 patients who
need the drug, and has been involved in several other social responsibility
initiatives. The company also has been widely recognised by independent organisations
for its CSR efforts and has received a volley of awards as acknowledgement of
its social responsibility. As one of the first signatories to the Global Compact,
Novartis has taken steps for generating awareness among its business partners
on issues such as abolition of child labour, fair living wages and is in the
process of devising steps to ensure implementation and compliance. Among its
social projects are providing education to the underprivileged and rehabilitation
of leprosy patients so that they are back to being productive members who are
integrated into society.
Similarly, at Piramal Healthcare social responsibility is integrated into the
mission of its businesses. "Currently, investments made in CSR activities,
are monitored internally through the Chairman's office and the leadership of
individual businesses. As we are working towards an integrated CSR policy, we
will bring oversight of CSR to a central team," says Dr Swati Piramal,
Director-Strategic Alliances and Communications, Piramal Healthcare. She continues,
"Explicitly, our CSR programmes are independent to divisions and operational
areas, and we are in the process of integrating our policy as part of our new
initiatives to build a single brand." Piramal Healthcare's CSR activities
are decentralised and determined by divisions. In addition, over the course
of the last two years, the company has developed centralised initiatives through
the Piramal Foundation and has partnered with several NGOs, government agencies
and educational institutions on initiatives ranging from grassroots development,
rural healthcare, education, and the Piramal Prize for Innovations that Democratise
Healthcare.
CSR of employees, by employees
CSR can also be and is being implemented internally in organisations keeping
the employees in mind. For instance, Shahani says that Novartis provides its
employees with the safest possible workplace, and promotes their health and
well-being. The company has also put in place a health policy for the management
of HIV/AIDS, tuberculosis and malaria that covers employees and their immediate
family members. Environment sustainability is also an integral part of the company's
strategy-it protects the environment by operating to the highest standards.
Involvement of employees in executing various CSR policies is very crucial.
This helps in inculcating pride in employees for the company, and making them
more sensitised participants while contributing towards the CSR objectives of
the company. This is a far more effective, and long-lasting method of practising
CSR as compared to contributions from employee pay-roll and volunteerism, which
is often not voluntary and is usually also temporary. For instance, Piramal
Healthcare has started both employee volunteer programmes and payroll giving
programmes in partnership with iVolunteer and the Give Foundation.
Likewise, at Novartis every employee is involved at some level in the furtherance
of corporate citizenship. Also, the Board has adopted the Corporate Citizenship/Code
of Conduct policy with a focus on 'the triple bottom line'. "Training of
employees in corporate citizenship is an ongoing exercise. While new recruits
undergo an initial training, there are regular refresher programs and online
e-training for corporate citizenship and code of conduct carried out at global
and local levels. Tracking of the training process is done and certificates
are issued on completion of the e-training. Posters, direct mailers and articles
in the in-house magazine are other avenues that are used to raise awareness
levels," says Shahani.
He says that globally, Novartis dedicates one day every year to community work
where employees are encouraged to go out on company time and work for the community.
"In India, we encourage people to go beyond this one day. This has resulted
in these activities being spread over a period of seven to ten days. Around
ten to 15 percent of our employees participate in this activity. Each year we
encourage employees to go out and work in the community during Novartis Community
Partnership Week and we have around 400 employees doing so. We also have employees
volunteering on a weekly basis as part of the Akanksha mentor program,"
he adds. Akanksha is an NGO that works with underprivileged children. Commenting
on the resource allocated by the company to CSR, Shahani says, "We do not
have a fixed percentage of profits allocated for this purpose. Our contribution
varies depending on needs at any given point of time."
|
Company name
|
Income/sales Rs (cr)
|
Minimum CSR spend—
0.2% of income (cr)
|
Net Profit
Rs (cr)
|
Karmayog
CSR Rating
|
CSR Reach
|
CSR activities
|
|
a
|
b
|
c
|
| Abbott India |
460 |
0.9 |
100 |
5-Jan |
|
y |
y |
environment, health, support projects—abbottfunds
|
| Alembic |
530 |
1.1 |
50 |
5-Jan |
|
y |
|
healthcare, education |
| Aurobindo Pharma |
1,100 |
2.2 |
35 |
0/5 |
|
|
|
|
| Aventis Pharma |
750 |
1.5 |
150 |
5-Jan |
y |
|
|
disaster, marathon |
| Biocon |
660 |
1.3 |
175 |
5-Feb |
|
y |
y |
education |
| Cadila Healthcare |
1,150 |
2.3 |
130 |
5-Feb |
|
y |
|
education, healthcare |
| Cipla |
2,335 |
4.7 |
410 |
5-Feb |
|
y |
y |
pallative care, education in pallative care |
| Divi's Laboratories |
365 |
0.7 |
65 |
5-Feb |
|
y |
|
community development, environment |
| Dr Reddy’s Laboratories |
1,630 |
3.3 |
65 |
5-Mar |
|
y |
y |
social entp, education, livelihood, environment |
| Elder Pharmaceuticals |
290 |
0.6 |
20 |
0/5 |
|
|
|
|
| FDC |
350 |
0.7 |
55 |
0/5 |
|
|
|
|
| GlaxoSmithKline Pharma |
1,425 |
2.9 |
330 |
5-Jan |
|
y |
y |
education, healthcare,AIDS helpline |
| Glenmark Pharma |
470 |
0.9 |
65 |
0/5 |
|
|
|
|
| Ind-Swift |
300 |
0.6 |
25 |
0/5 |
|
|
|
|
| Ipca Laboratories |
700 |
1.4 |
100 |
0/5 |
|
|
|
|
| J.B.Chemicals & Pharmaceuticals |
350 |
0.7 |
50 |
5-Feb |
|
y |
|
medical, disaster, education |
| Lupin |
1,000 |
2 |
85 |
5-Mar |
|
y |
y |
infrastructure, rural industry and more |
| Matrix Laboratories |
650 |
1.3 |
130 |
5-Jan |
|
y |
|
environment |
| Merck |
400 |
0.8 |
70 |
5-Jan |
|
y |
|
environment |
| Nicholas Piramal India |
1,200 |
2.4 |
150 |
0/5 |
|
|
|
|
| Novartis India |
500 |
1 |
65 |
5-Feb |
|
|
|
health, computer, AIDS and more |
| Orchid Chemicals & Pharma |
600 |
1.2 |
30 |
5-Feb |
|
y |
y |
healthcare, education, more |
| Panacea Biotec |
330 |
0.7 |
30 |
0/5 |
|
|
|
|
| Pfizer |
600 |
1.2 |
50 |
5-Feb |
|
y |
y |
community, health, awareness |
| Ranbaxy Laboratories |
3,500 |
7 |
500 |
5-Feb |
|
y |
|
community particpation, health |
| Shasun Chemicals And Drugs |
300 |
0.6 |
30 |
5-Jan |
|
y |
|
environment |
| Sterling Biotech |
400 |
0.8 |
100 |
0/5 |
|
|
|
|
| Sun Pharmaceutical Industries |
1,200 |
2.4 |
300 |
5-Jan |
|
y |
|
environment |
| Torrent Pharmaceuticals |
500 |
1 |
55 |
5-Feb |
|
y |
y |
disaster, medical and more |
| Unichem Laboratories |
400 |
0.8 |
50 |
5-Jan |
|
y |
|
environment |
| Wockhardt |
900 |
1.8 |
200 |
5-Feb |
|
y |
|
HIV/AIDS, disaster |
| Wyeth |
300 |
0.6 |
40 |
5-Jan |
|
y |
|
health awareness |
| Total |
25,645 |
51.3 |
3,710 |
|
|
|
|
|
Source: www.karmayog.com
aCSR for employees, bCSR within vicinity, cCSR for society
at large |
Swimming upstream
" The challenge before the pharma companies is a difficult one. The dilemma
is to balance increased commitment to CSR in developing countries and elsewhere
against the demands of investor and financial markets to generate sufficient
financial returns on extensive investments in R&D," says Shahani. "We
need all stakeholders to come together to solve the complex problem of access
where medicine prices and intellectual property are only 'two pieces of the
puzzle'. A range of underlying and related issues with respect to health infrastructure,
inequitable or otherwise, are inefficient health systems, under funding on healthcare,
poverty etc," he says. Governments too have a principal role to play in
this as do public-private partnerships. Tiered pricing, donation programmes
and CSR activities can alleviate the problem to some extent, but are not a sustainable
solution, he adds.
The private sector has great societal obligations, hence,
making products relevant to the market at affordable prices, having a more flexible
and ethical distribution and marketing system, and inculcating all of the above
in their business strategies in the emerging markets that they penetrate, would
be treated as part of CSR for those companies. Its not that the pharmacos are
not working towards these goals; pharma MNCs are doing research in tuberculosis,
malaria, sleeping sickness, shistosomiasis, kala azar, dengue fever and river
blindness to name some of the developing country diseases they are focusing
on, says Shahani. In addition to these efforts, pharma MNCs have set up institutes
dedicated to tropical research diseases. AstraZeneca, for instance, set up the
Bangalore Research Institute for Research into drug-resistant tuberculosis,
Eli Lilly has a not-for-profit public private partnership for tuberculosis early
phase drug discovery in Seattle, USA; Novartis has the Novartis Institute for
Tropical Diseases in Singapore which is dedicated to discovering novel therapies
and preventive treatments for major tropical diseases, which will be available
at no profit to poor patients in endemic developing countries; and Glaxo has
the Diseases of the Developing World Discovery Centre in Tres Cantos, Spain
for the discovery and development of new drugs for neglected diseases with a
special focus on malaria and TB.
Meeting expectations
Rising markets are rapidly being recognised as a magic solution for the industry's
deteriorating growth. As the potential in these markets gets marked down (for
lower R&D costs, clinical trials and cost-effective manufacturing), the
industry has to come up with a completely different approach that will take
into consideration enormous income disparities, consequence of soaring prices
on the already vulnerable and insecure population, and need for relevant medicines.
Is it justified to say that the sector is living up to these expectations? Society,
in general, has low expectations for any sector or company regarding CSR. This
is beginning to change, with greater awareness about CSR spreading across society.
"The pharma sector can be considered to be a 'high impact' sector, where
processes, products and their usage have wide-ranging, deep, permanent impacts
on society and people's lives; in this context, for a high-impact sector, the
expectations of CSR would also be correspondingly high," says Somani. "And
at the moment, the pharma sector does not appear to be living up to these expectations,
on the basis of publicly released and available data about pharma companies,"
he adds.
Shahani opines, "We need to look at the larger picture of healthcare, including
health-care infrastructure, rather than look at just the pharma industry in
isolation. Govern-ment needs to look at public-private partnerships more closely,
as well as increase healthcare spend. Today, it is possible to get a branded
soft drink in a remote village as well as have cell phone connectivity, but
this is not the case for access to basic healthcare, which gets increasingly
difficult as you go out of urban and semi-urban areas in the country."
To meet the challenge of access to medicines, companies need to address society's
expectations, without which, they cannot exercise the various approaches that
they intend to practice.
aashruti.kak@expressindia.com
|