|
Nurturing Industry Needs
With the new government comes renewed hope that the new Minister
of Chemicals, Petrochemicals and Fertilizers, Muthuvel Karunanidhi Azhagiri,
will bring with him a fresh look at policy issues simmering on the back burner.
Stalwarts from the Indian pharmaceutical industry share their wish lists with
Usha Sharma
 |

Ranjit Shahani
Vice Chairman
and Managing Director,
Novartis
|
The state of a country can be best judged by the
state of its people in terms of health and education, two areas that remain
a challenge for India. 65 percent of India's population resides in rural
India with little or no access to quality healthcare. It is an irony that
a significant number of people in India do not have access to medicines
in a country with the largest number of US FDA approved plants outside
the US. India is today knows for its skills in IT, the IT industry flourished
in the backdrop of progressive policies that were specially crafted for
the sector.
Pharma industry in India is the next sunrise industry
and on the threshold of a great opportunity. The Ministry of Chemicals,
Petrochemicals and Fertilisers can play a key role in ensuring that the
sector receives the right impetus to grasp this opportunity be it by way
of healthcare infrastructure or by way of putting in place the right policies.
One hopes that the Ministry will look to price monitoring as opposed to
price control and allows market forces to decide pricing. It would certainly
be a travesty of justice if we were to go back in time to an era when
the majority of drugs were price controlled. In fact, pricing norms, if
any, should be made more transparent and realistic. We still have some
way to go before we can be proud of world class patent rights. In addition,
government needs to put in place at least some minimum standards of data
protection to begin with. We need to leave behind our old mindset of protectionism
and look to create a pharma industry which will serve as a beacon to the
rest of the world. We also need to keep the long term interests of the
health of the people of India at heart.
The honourable Minister of Chemicals, Petrochemicals
and Fertilisers has the opportunity of a lifetime to deliver to the people
of India world class healthcare and to broaden access through innovative
public private partnerships. It is now up to him to make good that promise.
|

Daara B Patel
Secretary General,
Indian Drug Manufacturers' Association (IDMA)
|
To ensure a progressive 'Pharmaceutical Policy'
and to lessen the adverse implications of the 'Draft Policy', it would
be better to give up cost based 'Price Control' completely and consider
'Monitoring Prices'. Of non-scheduled drugs, Public Private Partnership
between government and industry, repealing drug price control order (DPCO)
1995 and proper interpretation of the order of the Supreme Court, etc.
in implementing the Pharma Policy would be some ways to reduce the burden
on the industry and at the same time, ensure continuous supply of affordable
medicines.
Though Pharma Policy rightly recommends monitoring
of prices instead of controlling them, the policy does not envisage setting
up of price monitoring cells across the country. There is no need to have
that kind of a structure, as manufacturers mark single MRP on all products
which sold all over the country. The DPCO has vested National Pharmaceutical
Pricing Authority (NPPA) with powers to question any manufacturer on his
product's printed prices and hence random sampling by NPPA would suffice.
NPPA should set up cells in remote areas to ensure that all the poor patients
have access to these affordable medicines.
Government can with its prompt and timely actions
ensure that the industry continues to produce quality affordable drugs
without stoppages. These actions include gradually decontrolling all prices,
except patented drugs, provide R&D support by setting up top class
labs, provide Information Technology (IT) exemptions to R&D work,
raise Central Consumer Protection Council (CCPC) norms and link prices
to inflation index etc. Also, to ensure access to imported patented drugs,
the DPCO 1995 pricing mechanism needs to be immediately revised to calculate
production cost instead of landed cost to ensure that the selling price
provides a more realistic figure.
Other issues which require the Minister's attention
are:
- Keeping all non-scheduled drugs out of
purview of DPCO 1995
- 20 percent increase in prices of non-scheduled
drugs annually to be allowed
- No suo moto reduction in prices of scheduled
drugs - rupee appreciation, dollar depreciation, fall in prices of raw
materials etc are all temporary phenomena
|

Tapan Ray
Director General,
Organisation of Pharmaceutical Producers of India (OPPI)
|
I would expect the new UPA Government to have a
fresh relook at the current policy, which was prepared in the last millennium
and soon announce an inclusive growth oriented 'new drug policy', matching
the progressive outlook of young India.
Affordability: The new policy should ensure
adequate availability of all 'National List of Essential Medicines' (NLEM)
at affordable prices. 'Jan Aushadhi' initiative of the Department of Pharmaceuticals
(DoP) should be strengthened further through public-private-partnership
(PPP) initiatives and by using strong public distribution outlets like
ration shops and post offices for effective rural penetration of the scheme.
Considering the access arena the government should make
proper use of its existing initiatives, take some new initiatives and
dovetail them as follows:
'National Rural Health Mission' (NRHM):
To create rural healthcare infrastructure.
'Jan Aushadhi' scheme: To extend the reach
of affordable medicines to a vast majority of rural population. Simultaneously,
creating innovative 'Health Insurance Schemes' for all sections of the
society through PPP, like, 'Yashasvini', pioneered by Dr Devi Shetty of
Bangalore and the Government of Karnataka, which is possibly the world's
cheapest comprehensive Health Insurance scheme, at Rs five (11 cents)
per month, for the poor farmers of the state. The new policy should plan
to provide adequate fiscal incentives for R&D initiatives taken by
the pharma industry of India. The new policy should play an enabling role
for companies carrying out clinical studies in India not only to help
them record a healthy growth, but also to attract more 'foreign direct
investments' (FDI) for the country.
Exports: To give greater boosts to exports
Pharmexcil should be further strengthened to act as an effective nodal
centre for all pharma exports, which should also undertake promotional
activities to accelerate growth of pharma exports
Employment generation: Recommendations to
be provided in the new policy should further accelerate employment generation
by the pharma industry.
Contribution towards the country's economic
growth: Innovative new 'drug policy' initiative of the new government
should not only ensure a stimulating inclusive growth for the industry,
but also help attract adequate FDI for the country.
|
'We have done well in spite of the Government',
ask any leader in the pharma industry and this sentiment is likely to
be expressed by most. While this may or may not be entirely true, the
government's role in a modern economy is not only regulatory but also
developmental. Now that the newly formed government is shorn of the
coalition compulsions of the past, it is time to put this
knowledge based industry on a higher growth trajectory. Following are
some of the suggestions to achieve this goal.
-

Dr Ajit Dangi
President and Chief
Executive Officer,
Danssen Consulting
|
Price Control:
For the past several decades successive governments reduced the span
of price control in a phased manner with only 74 drugs under price control
in DPCO 1995. This enlightened policy resulted in emergence of a vibrant
and globally competitive pharma industry, unfortunately, the National
Pharmaceutical Policy - 2006, reversed this positive trend and proposed
to bring all the 354 essential drugs under price control. This illogical
policy needs to be scrapped. The pharma industry is intensely competitive
and highly fragmented with over 10,000 manufacturers. Even the market
leader has less than six percent market share. Most molecules have over
20 - 100 copy brands available making price control redundant. Recently,
placed 10 percent cap per year for price increase on decontrolled products
is also illogical particularly when inflation had crossed 10 percent
in mid 2008 and rupee has devalued over 20 percent against the dollar.
We need to find an alternative model to make medicines affordable to
the masses other than the rigid price control.
- Access to medicines: This is the
most important challenge. It is unfortunate that in spite of low prices
and glut of generics in the market, less than 40 percent Indians have
access to essential medicines. This is largely because of lack of health
infrastructure such as diagnostic facilities medical professionals'
chemists, nursing homes, hospitals etc; in the rural area. This needs
to be radically improved by giving appropriate incentives.
- Transaction costs: More than 50
percent of medicine prices are transaction costs. These include excise
and import duties, VAT, Octroi distributor and retailer margins etc.
We should quickly move to Goods and Service Tax (GST) removing multiplicity
of taxes, which has not only cascading effect but also acts as a barrier
for smooth movement of goods across the states.
- Central Drug Authority:
Multiplicity of State FDAs has resulted in varying degree of implementation
of manufacturing standards and proliferation of irrational drugs. The
recommendation of Mashelkar Committee to have a Central Drug Authority
on the lines of US FDA should be implemented speedily.
- IPR protection: While India has
honoured the WTO commitment and enacted the Patent Act 2005, allowing
product patents for 20 years, there are several deficiencies which need
to be ironed out. The most important being narrowing of the definition
of patentability only to NCEs (unless significant efficacy is proved).
The definition needs to be expanded to include polymorphs, metabolites,
new indications, NDDS etc. as long as these inventions are novel, non-
obvious and have commercial application. To illustrate, if an Indian
scientist develops an oral dosage form of insulin as against the injectable
form presently available, which will revolutionise the anti diabetic
therapy, will he/she get a patent? Not likely under the present law.
Provision for data protection, inspite
of deliberation of two committeesSatwant Reddy and Murli Manohar
Joshi committees, is a disincentive to research based pharma industry.
At least five years of data protection from the date of marketing approval
of the new drug in India needs to be actively considered. Due to ambiguities
in the Patent Act, litigation is on the increase. A dedicated Intellectual
Property (IP) court on the lines of those in USA, Japan, China etc.
for quick resolution of IP matters and scrapping the provision for Pre
Grant Opposition will improve the quality of IPR enforcement. Another
important issue is biodiversity. The benefits arising from the use need
to be shared with the providers and USA must be persuaded to sign the
Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD).
- Research and development: R&D
and innovation is the life blood of pharma industry. Good IPR protection,
availability of funding and scientific talent with appropriate skill
set are key drivers for spurring R&D. Government's plan to develop
five new National Institute of Pharmaceutical Education and Research
centres (NIPERs) countrywide should be accelerated. The recently announced
Rs 10, 000 crore. R&D tax free bonds every year till 2020 to fund
drug discovery and DBT's Biotech Industry Partnership Programme (BIPP)
with Rs 350 crore. The package will not only give fillip to R&D
but will also underwrite the risk involved in drug discovery. Industry-academia
partnership for drug discovery research particularly for diseases of
the poor should also be similarly incentivised.
- Public Sector Pharma Units: While
most of the pharma industry has been reasonably profitable, public sector
undertakings (PSUs) like Indian Drugs and Pharmaceutical Ltd (IDPL),Hindustan
Antibiotics Ltd (HAL) etc. have turned sick. The reason is incompetent
management. A prestigious institute like Haffkine in Mumbai was temporarily
closed down by the Maharashtra FDA for GMP non-compliance. This is a
case in point rather than getting into pharma business by reviving the
sick PSUs as proposed by the Ministry of Chemicals, Government should
focus on creating conducive environment through positive policy intervention
with proper oversight.
- Health insurance: Over 80 percent
of India's population pay from their own pocket for medicines. This
burden should be reduced by expanding the Health Insurance and successful
schemes like Yashaswini, Aarogyasri etc, should be introduced countrywide.
Several international health insurance companies are waiting in the
wings to enter India but with 26 percent equity cap they are reluctant
to do so. Increasing the cap to 49 percent as proposed will not only
bring new investment in this vital sector but also the international
expertise.
- Regulatory reforms: Regulatory
agencies play an important role in development of pharma industry. India's
abundant patient population, well qualified medical professionals and
cost competitiveness can make India a destination of choice for clinical
trials on new drugs. GCP guidelines need to be made mandatory (schedule
Y) and CROs need to be audited and licensed. If proper regulations,
SOPs and protocols are in place there is no reason why permission for
conducting phase I studies for drugs discovered outside India cannot
be granted. A multibillion dollar market is opening up for biosimilars
globally. India should formulate biosimilar regulatory pathway on the
lines of European Medicines Agency (EMEA) and proposed US FDA draft
guidelines giving impetus to this opportunity. Patent linkage between
the DCGI office and Controller of patents also needs to be addressed
on priority. Many safe and effective drugs with good safety record over
several years need to be de-listed from prescription drug category and
well defined OTC policy needs to be formulated. The archaic rule of
exemption from selling licence for villages of population under 1000
need to be scrapped and medicines for minor ailments such as cough and
cold, pain, acidity, fever, skin afflictions etc should be allowed to
be sold without selling license or one time registration fee.
- Labour reforms:
Maharashtra is perhaps the only state in the country where Medical Representatives
are classified as 'workmen' resulting in over 20,000 labour related
disputes in labour courts. The Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions
and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act (MRTU & PULP Act)
needs to be repealed. Also exit policy for closing non viable units
should be simplified.
Finally, one often wonders why pharma industry
is placed under the Ministry of Chemicals. Pharma industry the world
over is gradually moving from chemistry to biology and needs a different
mindset to capitalise on future opportunities. The grouping of three
disparate industries; Chemicals, Fertilisers and Steel under one umbrella
has often resulted in lack of focus for pharma and needs to be reviewed,
most of the suggestions made above are achievable without much parliamentary
intervention (except perhaps IPR protection) and is a matter of executive
decision. All it requires is a strong political will as shown in signing
the Nuclear Deal.
|
Finance
-

Chetan Tamhankar
Chief Operating Officer,
SIRO Clinpharm
|
Tax exemption available on Export Oriented
Units (EOUs) till March 2010, to be extended
- Industry should be considered as 'sunrise'
industry and granted same benefits given to IT many years back
Infrastructure
- Uninterrupted power and water supply
- Appropriate investments in government
hospitals especially in tier II and tier III cities
Education
- Introduction of a course on 'Clinical
Research Methodology' during 4th year of Bachelor of Pharmaceutical
Sciences curriculum as well as for MBBS students
- Accreditation of clinical research education
institutes to avoid their uncontrolled proliferation
Regulatory
- Single window clearance system for approvals
- Draft guidance on paediatric and stem
cell oriented clinical trials
- Guidance for industry over conduct and
approval process for biotech; genetically and r-DNA originated molecules
- Clarity on the review process for new
clinical trial applications by DCGI
- Guidance for industry from DCGI on conduct
of only India - specific Phase II or III trials for molecule originated
abroad
- Review timelines for clinical trial application,
should be the same as that of earlier timelines of four weeks and six
weeks
- Bring clarity in reporting safety reports
to DCGI office e.g. submission of SUSARs, SAEs, CIOMS
- Design a solid review process for clinical
trial proposals
- Issue guidelines for registration of ethics
committees / IRBs
|
-

T S Jaishankar
Chairman,
CIPI and CII SME Task force
|
To publicly announce officially that the
India pharma products are the lowest priced in the world
- Divert the attention of the Consumer Councils
and the general public to hospital charges, diagnostics, which form
90 percent of the patient treatment that medicine
- Do not overdo price control on medicines
causing shortage of essential medicines
- Allow 300 percent Maximum Allowable Post-manufacturing
Expenses (MAPE), to encourage industry to survive and produce all products
as per DPCO
- Remove Fringe Benefit Tax (FBT) on medical
representatives' allowances and overall marketing expenses of medicines.
This is because medicines are under price control
- Consider SSI Units in par with public
sector undertakings (PSUs) for supply to government institutions PSUs
- Instruct all to drop minimum sales criteria
for participation in tenders
- Pharma policy should be announced within
three months to have clarity for industry
- Accept the recommendation of the committee
formed by DCGI on spurious drugs notification
|

M Gandhi
Managing Director,
UBM India
|
Priority should be given to establish a long-term
strategy for positive development of Indian pharma industry, while taking
into consideration the social and economic implications. A comprehensive
vision document done in consultation with all stake holders will ensure
sustainable growth, thus making it one of the 'engines' of Indian economy.
Pharma policies when implemented could have major political,
social and economic implications both positive and negative balancing
these issues while preparing the strategy document shall need wisdom and
strength to unite all parties. Differentiating India from the rest of
the world as a brand for quality and innovation in drug discovery and
development is imperative. Regulations that provide incentives to organisations
that uphold the positive image of India, while aggressively and mercilessly
weeding out the 'black-sheep' is the need of the hour. This could only
happen by having a transparent policy in place, implemented by highly
committed and talented officials.
It is vital that special emphasis is provided to all
aspects of the pharma industrybulk drugs, API's, generic, drug discovery,
clinical research, bio-pharma, natural medicine, machinery and equipment,
etc. Having clear technology foresight and policies facilitating the quick
assimilation of new knowledge, will keep India at the forefront.
The Minister should motivate the industry to invest in
drug discovery, explore and develop mutually beneficial partnerships with
emerging markets for growth while continuing to acquire market share from
the developed world.
India's ability to provide affordable and quality
drugs to the world as a reliable supplier, will definitely add value in
positioning brand India while retaining our historical value systems that
propagate kindness and integrity.
|
u.sharma@expressindia.com
|